H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Carling Bassett Seguso vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-0

Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 1–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1985 Tampa quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

CAN Age 58 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-2 7-5 Grace Kim Match data Nov 9, 1985* QF Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carling Bassett Seguso 2,010 149 102 59.4% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Grace Kim 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 2–3 40.0% 1,521 0 0 1982 7–3 70.0% 1,585 0 1
15 1983 35–21 62.5% 1,832 0 1 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,591 0 1
16 1984 37–20 64.9% 1,940 0 1 1984 6–10 37.5% 1,622 0 1
17 1985 30–17 63.8% 1,880 0 1 1985 17–25 40.5% 1,694 0 1
18 1986 18–12 60.0% 1,847 0 1 1986 10–22 31.2% 1,605 0 1
19 1987 16–12 57.1% 1,831 0 2 1987 5–13 27.8% 1,515 0 1
20 1988 4–7 36.4% 1,770 0 2 1988 0–5 0.0% 1,469 0 1
21 1989 3–4 42.9% 1,756 0 2
22 1990 3–3 50.0% 1,760 0 2
24 1992 1–3 25.0% 1,729 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1989 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 56 38 94 59.6% 49 23 72 68.1% 21 17 38 55.3% 23 24 47 48.9% 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1521 110.0 +60 50.0% -0.25 0–2 1–0 +0.23 1982 1586 114.0 +73 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 1983 1832 140.3 -64 -80 -107 59.8% +0.66 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 110.3 +0.14 1983 1592 115.9 +65 30.8% -1.00 1–0 -0.06
16 1984 1941 159.0 -37 -6 -187 63.0% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -3.26 1984 1622 113.8 +26 +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1985 1881 145.2 +31 +22 -161 61.3% +0.77 7–5 (58%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +2.09 1985 1694 125.2 +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1986 1847 143.9 -1 +75 -75 56.9% +0.43 7–5 (58%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -1.57 1986 1605 117.7 +47 -126 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1987 1832 140.5 -36 +154 -85 57.1% +0.49 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -1.25 1987 1515 97.7 +45 -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +2.17
20 1988 1770 121.3 -27 41.7% -0.08 0–2 0–2 -1.13 1988 1469 96.4 -61 0.0% -3.90 0–1 -0.26
21 1989 1756 117.9 -30 46.2% -0.77 1–0 0–1 -1.02
22 1990 1761 124.8 +191 50.0% +0.07 1–1 -0.23
24 1992 1729 109.6 22.2% -1.67 1–0 -0.51
Career 2010 150.8 -15 +28 -122 58.0% +0.54 38–30 (56%) 20–19 (51%) 102.7 -2.60 1705 119.1 +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.