H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Carling Bassett Seguso vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0

Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1986 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-1 6-4.

CAN Age 59 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-1 6-4 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Jan 29, 1986* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carling Bassett Seguso — — — 2,011 149 102 59.4% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
14 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1983 35–21 62.5% — 1,833 0 1 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1984 37–20 64.9% — 1,941 0 1 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1985 30–17 63.8% — 1,881 0 1 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1986 18–12 60.0% — 1,847 0 1 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1987 16–12 57.1% — 1,832 0 2 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,770 0 2 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,756 0 2 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 1990 3–3 50.0% — 1,761 0 2 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 1992 1–3 25.0% — 1,729 0 2 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1989 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 38 94 59.6% 49 23 72 68.1% 21 17 38 55.3% 23 24 47 48.9% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
14 1982 1522 110.1 — — — — +59 — — 50.0% -0.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 1833 140.5 — — — — -64 -80 -108 59.8% +0.66 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 110.3 +0.30 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 1984 1941 159.2 — — — — -36 -5 -187 63.0% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -3.25 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1985 1881 145.4 — — — — +32 +23 -161 61.3% +0.77 7–5 (58%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +2.10 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1986 1848 144.0 — — — — -1 +74 -76 56.9% +0.43 7–5 (58%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -1.30 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1987 1832 140.5 — — — — -35 +154 -85 57.1% +0.49 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -0.67 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1988 1771 121.4 — — — — -28 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–2 0–2 — -1.12 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 1989 1757 117.9 — — — — -30 — — 46.2% -0.77 1–0 0–1 — -0.78 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 1990 1761 124.9 — — — — — +191 — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 — — -0.23 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 1992 1730 109.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.67 1–0 — — -0.51 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 2011 151.0 — — — — -15 +28 -122 58.0% +0.54 38–30 (56%) 20–19 (51%) 102.7 -2.10 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.