H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carling Bassett Seguso vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 4-0
Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 4–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1986 Los Angeles second round 6-0 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 58
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Carling Bassett Seguso | 6-0 2-6 6-1 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Carling Bassett Seguso | 6-4 2-6 6-0 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Carling Bassett Seguso | 6-2 6-1 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Carling Bassett Seguso | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carling Bassett Seguso | — | — | — | 2,009 | 149 | 101 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carling Bassett Seguso | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1982 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1983 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1984 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–12 | 60.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |