H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Carling Bassett Seguso vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Carling Bassett Seguso holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carling Bassett Seguso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carling Bassett Seguso won the 1986 Hilton Head round of 64 6-3 1-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carling Bassett Seguso
CAN Age 58 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carling Bassett Seguso 6-3 1-6 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #116 Match data Apr 9, 1986* R64 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carling Bassett Seguso — — — 2,010 149 102 59.4% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 2–3 40.0% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1983 35–21 62.5% — 1,832 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1984 37–20 64.9% — 1,940 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1985 30–17 63.8% — 1,880 0 1 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1986 18–12 60.0% — 1,847 0 1 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1987 16–12 57.1% — 1,831 0 2 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,770 0 2 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,756 0 2 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1990 3–3 50.0% — 1,760 0 2 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1992 1–3 25.0% — 1,729 0 2 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1986 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1989 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 38 94 59.6% 49 23 72 68.1% 21 17 38 55.3% 23 24 47 48.9% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carling Bassett Seguso Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1521 110.0 — — — — +60 — — 50.0% -0.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 1832 140.3 — — — — -64 -80 -107 59.8% +0.66 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 110.3 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 1941 159.0 — — — — -37 -6 -187 63.0% +0.84 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -3.26 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1985 1881 145.2 — — — — +31 +22 -161 61.3% +0.77 7–5 (58%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +2.09 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1986 1847 143.9 — — — — -1 +75 -75 56.9% +0.43 7–5 (58%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -1.57 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1987 1832 140.5 — — — — -36 +154 -85 57.1% +0.49 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 -1.25 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1988 1770 121.3 — — — — -27 — — 41.7% -0.08 0–2 0–2 — -1.13 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1989 1756 117.9 — — — — -30 — — 46.2% -0.77 1–0 0–1 — -1.02 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1990 1761 124.8 — — — — — +191 — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 — — -0.23 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1992 1729 109.6 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.67 1–0 — — -0.51 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 2010 150.8 — — — — -15 +28 -122 58.0% +0.54 38–30 (56%) 20–19 (51%) 102.7 -2.60 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.