H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Carmen Perea Alcala vs Andrea Tiezzi H2H: 1-1
Carmen Perea Alcala and Andrea Tiezzi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Carmen Perea Alcala won the 1982 Rio de Janeiro third round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1982* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Carmen Perea Alcala | 7-5 7-6 | Andrea Tiezzi | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1982* | Brasilia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Tiezzi | 6-3 6-3 | Carmen Perea Alcala | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carmen Perea Alcala | — | — | — | 1,662 | 49 | 55 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrea Tiezzi | — | — | — | 1,584 | 22 | 29 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carmen Perea Alcala | Andrea Tiezzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |