H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Carole Graebner vs Lucinda Crosby H2H: 0-1 (incl. walkovers)

Carole Graebner vs Lucinda Crosby: 0–0 excluding walkovers; 0–1 including 1 walkover. Across 1 main-draw results including walkovers, Lucinda Crosby leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucinda Crosby won the 1972 Kingston quarterfinal W/O.

H2H including walkovers
0 1
1 main-draw results

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucinda Crosby (w/o) Carole Graebner Match data Dec 17, 1972* QF Kingston WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carole Graebner 1,662 31 38 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lucinda Crosby 1,500 2 10 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Carole Graebner Lucinda Crosby
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 11–7 61.1% 1,577 0 0 1968 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
1969 2–6 25.0% 1,518 0 0 1969 0–2 0.0% 1,440 0 0
1970 12–9 57.1% 1,637 0 0 1970 0–3 0.0% 1,400 0 0
1971 0–3 0.0% 1,623 0 0 1972 2–3 40.0% 1,404 0 0
1972 3–8 27.3% 1,613 0 0
1973 0–3 0.0% 1,573 0 0
1974 2–1 66.7% 1,594 0 0
1975 1–1 50.0% 1,585 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Carole Graebner Lucinda Crosby
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1968 0 2 2 0.0%
1969 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1970 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1974 2 1 3 66.7%
1975 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 3 4 25.0% Career 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Carole Graebner Lucinda Crosby
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1578 110.5 +137 61.5% +0.44 1–2 (33%) +0.09 1968 1476 94.1 20.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.08
1969 1518 92.4 -51 33.3% -1.45 0–2 +0.63 1969 1440 87.3 0.0% -4.50 +0.51
1970 1638 121.8 +20 +8 57.1% +0.47 3–4 (43%) +0.25 1970 1400 84.4 14.3% -3.00 0–1 +0.38
1971 1623 113.9 0.0% -3.50 0–1 -0.63 1972 1405 99.7 25.0% -2.63 +0.22
1972 1613 113.5 -17 33.3% -1.21 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.77
1973 1574 96.6 20.0% -2.40 0–1 +0.10
1974 1595 109.9 +16 66.7% +1.50 +0.34
1975 1585 99.2 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 +0.91
Career 1662 115.7 +109 -8 48.0% -0.26 7–11 (39%) 1–5 (17%) 94.1 +1.35 Career 1500 86.1 16.7% -3.13 0–2 +9.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.