H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 3-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 3–0 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2018 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 7-5 6-3 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2016* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Caroline Garcia | 7-5 6-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2015* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Caroline Garcia | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |