H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Jie Zheng H2H: 1-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 43
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 6-4 | Jie Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Jie Zheng | #961 | #15 | 2,745 | 1,898 | 216 | 193 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Jie Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #33 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #26 | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #962 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |