H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 2-1
Caroline Garcia holds a 2–1 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2019 Limoges third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2019* | Limoges | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-2 6-2 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2016* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 7-5 6-2 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |