H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Caroline Wozniacki vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-0
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2011 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-0 6-2 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Caroline Wozniacki | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Wozniacki | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |