H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Carrie Cunningham vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-1

Carrie Cunningham and Kimiko Date Krumm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1992 Key Biscayne third round 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carrie Cunningham
USA Age 54
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 3-6 6-1 6-1 Carrie Cunningham #73 Match data
Sep 19, 1991* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R32 Hard Carrie Cunningham #53 2-6 6-4 7-5 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carrie Cunningham #801 #38 25 1,738 54 74 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carrie Cunningham Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #137 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 7–12 36.8% #85 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 10–13 43.5% #70 1,621 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1991 22–19 53.7% #51 1,679 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1992 10–13 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1993 2–10 16.7% #249 1,572 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1994 0–3 0.0% #634 1,538 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8