H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Carrie Cunningham vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 1-0

Carrie Cunningham holds a 1–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carrie Cunningham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carrie Cunningham won the 1992 US Open round of 32 2-6 6-4 6-0.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carrie Cunningham #72 2-6 6-4 6-0 Noelle Van Lottum Match data Sep 6, 1992* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carrie Cunningham #801 #38 25 1,738 54 74 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Noelle Van Lottum 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carrie Cunningham Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1988 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #137 1,520 0 0 1989 3–2 60.0% 1,533 0 0
17 1989 7–12 36.8% #85 1,535 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% 1,580 0 0
18 1990 10–13 43.5% #70 1,620 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% 1,531 0 0
19 1991 22–19 53.7% #51 1,678 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% 1,610 0 1
20 1992 10–13 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% 1,582 0 1
21 1993 2–10 16.7% #249 1,572 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% 1,575 0 1
22 1994 0–3 0.0% #634 1,538 0 0 1995 1–9 10.0% 1,465 0 1
23 1996 0–2 0.0% 1,441 0 1
24 1997 2–9 18.2% 1,426 0 1
25 1998 1–2 33.3% 1,428 0 1
26 1999 0–1 0.0% 1,416 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carrie Cunningham Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1989 3 9 12 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1991 15 14 29 51.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1992 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
22 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1998 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1999 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 39 52 91 42.9% 12 12 24 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carrie Cunningham Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1988 1507 102.1 60.0% +0.60 0–1 +0.28
16 1988 1521 110.9 +35 47.1% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.35 1989 1533 105.7 +43 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 +0.90
17 1989 1535 110.3 -22 +57 40.0% -0.93 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) +0.40 1990 1581 116.6 +44 60.0% -0.10 1–0 +0.14
18 1990 1621 130.8 -12 40.0% -0.56 4–2 (67%) 0–1 -1.01 1991 1532 111.1 +43 +16 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) +0.26
19 1991 1679 136.6 -8 -34 54.4% +0.51 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.69 1992 1610 125.2 +39 -43 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1992 1696 136.0 -6 -29 42.6% -0.26 5–3 (63%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 -0.82 1993 1583 123.6 +35 -30 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1993 1573 105.2 +51 +38 25.0% -1.82 1–3 (25%) -0.10 1994 1576 110.9 +14 +11 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) -0.09
22 1994 1538 102.3 +40 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 +0.06 1995 1465 92.1 +55 +58 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 +0.63
23 1996 1442 96.3 20.0% -2.80 0–1 +0.13
24 1997 1427 107.1 +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.01
25 1998 1429 97.9 +33 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.19
26 1999 1416 +0.09
Career 1738 131.8 -2 -3 43.3% -0.38 17–20 (46%) 6–12 (33%) 96.0 -0.34 1646 119.1 +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.