H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-1

Casey Dellacqua and Anabel Medina Garrigues are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2013 Indian Wells first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 5, 2013* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #62 6-1 6-3 Casey Dellacqua #131 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Casey Dellacqua #85 5-4 (ret.) Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11