H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 0-1

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Estoril fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 2011* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Jarmila Wolfe #31 6-2 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #538 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —