H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 2-1

Casey Dellacqua holds a 2–1 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2014 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 2014* Birmingham WTA 500 QF Grass Casey Dellacqua #43 6-1 6-0 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
Jan 10, 2013* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-1 Casey Dellacqua #99 Match data
Oct 11, 2012* Osaka WTA 250 R32 Hard Casey Dellacqua #84 6-3 3-6 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8