H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Kimiko Date H2H: 2-1
Casey Dellacqua holds a 2–1 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2014 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | 6-1 6-0 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Jun 14, 2014* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | QF | Grass |
| Kimiko Date | 6-4 6-1 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data | Jan 10, 2013* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
| Casey Dellacqua | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Oct 11, 2012* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,762 | 80 | 106 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Kimiko Date | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |