H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-0

Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2014 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Casey Dellacqua #48 7-5 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #125 Match data May 28, 2014* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,757 80 106 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,472 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,474 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,501 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,501 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2008 18–17 51.4% #53 1,629 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,597 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,563 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,541 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,592 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,490 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,741 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,628 0 0 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Casey Dellacqua Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 11 9 20 55.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 3 9 12 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 53 74 127 41.7% 10 16 26 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Casey Dellacqua Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1489 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1473 96.4 -3.43 -1.30 0.865 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2005 1475 101.7 -1.70 -1.14 0.860 46.6% +3 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2006 1501 113.4 -0.08 -1.23 0.504 37.7% -2 — — 37.5% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2007 1502 122.1 -1.56 -0.63 0.973 49.3% +17 — +91 43.2% -0.18 1–7 (13%) — — -0.01 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2008 1630 126.8 -0.29 +1.02 1.014 50.2% +9 -98 -24 47.5% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 103.0 +0.09 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2009 1598 101.9 -2.95 -1.13 0.664 40.6% +4 — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.17 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2010 1563 103.6 -3.53 -0.93 0.814 45.4% +23 — — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.55 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2011 1541 104.0 -1.59 -2.06 0.982 49.7% — -17 — 42.1% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.43 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2012 1593 122.1 -1.70 -0.55 0.901 47.8% -3 — +45 42.3% -0.52 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.51 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2013 1490 95.2 -2.07 -4.32 0.712 44.0% +4 — — 15.8% -2.16 0–1 0–2 — +1.12 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2014 1742 139.6 +0.67 +0.45 1.011 50.3% -28 -176 -39 55.2% +0.23 13–6 (68%) 4–5 (44%) 108.7 +0.21 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2015 1629 117.9 -0.10 -0.71 0.929 48.4% -22 -90 +90 43.1% -0.65 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 -0.22 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2016 1613 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1758 127.4 -0.70 -0.33 0.939 48.7% -5 -99 +29 43.8% -0.46 31–34 (48%) 14–22 (39%) 100.0 +0.60 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.