H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 1-0
Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2008 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Casey Dellacqua | 6-4 6-2 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Nathalie Dechy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |