H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 1-2

Nicole Vaidisova holds a 2–1 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2008 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Nicole Vaidisova
CZE Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Vaidisova #22 6-2 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #43 Match data Jun 28, 2008* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Casey Dellacqua #56 6-1 3-6 6-4 Nicole Vaidisova #14 Match data Mar 15, 2008* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nicole Vaidisova #12 5-7 7-5 6-0 Casey Dellacqua #86 Match data Jan 3, 2008* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,757 80 106 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Vaidisova #832 #7 1,981 2,006 155 85 64.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Nicole Vaidisova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2004 14–5 73.7% #75 1,672 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 2005 45–14 76.3% #15 1,948 0 5
17 — — — — — — — 2006 35–17 67.3% #10 1,936 0 6
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,489 0 0 2007 35–14 71.4% #12 1,954 0 6
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,472 0 0 2008 17–19 47.2% #41 1,703 0 6
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,474 0 0 2009 7–12 36.8% #175 1,575 0 6
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,501 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #666 1,576 0 6
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 18–17 51.4% #53 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,541 0 0 2015 1–3 25.0% #261 1,564 0 6
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,741 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Casey Dellacqua Nicole Vaidisova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 12 4 16 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 35 8 43 81.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 16 10 26 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 24 9 33 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 13 24 45.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
20 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 11 9 20 55.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 3 9 12 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 53 74 127 41.7% 10 16 26 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% — — — — — 105 54 159 66.0% 26 17 43 60.5% 18 10 28 64.3% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 163/185 of Casey Dellacqua's and 161/240 of Nicole Vaidisova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Casey Dellacqua Nicole Vaidisova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/19 1.0 2.0 51.2% 50.0% 33.3% 14.3% 50.0% 41.9% 39.6%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 17/59 7.0 3.2 61.5% 67.6% 52.6% 54.1% 45.8% 61.8% 44.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 41/52 5.4 3.5 62.1% 68.7% 48.3% 55.4% 42.2% 60.8% 44.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 48/49 6.3 3.4 61.5% 73.7% 49.9% 59.5% 48.0% 64.6% 44.0%
19 2004 1/2 2.0 6.0 53.4% 56.4% 41.2% 66.7% 37.5% 49.3% 43.8% 2008 31/36 5.2 3.6 61.0% 70.9% 44.7% 49.4% 42.8% 60.6% 40.7%
20 2005 1/3 1.0 7.0 54.3% 63.2% 50.0% 33.3% 42.9% 57.1% 36.8% 2009 18/19 3.3 4.8 56.2% 63.8% 37.8% 48.5% 47.7% 52.5% 41.8%
21 2006 1/7 1.0 7.0 47.4% 55.6% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 47.4% 26.5% 2010 2/2 5.0 3.0 65.2% 77.4% 35.4% 55.0% 45.8% 62.3% 40.1%
22 2007 17/18 1.8 3.6 60.5% 60.6% 44.5% 42.3% 53.2% 54.1% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 31/35 2.9 4.3 58.6% 63.1% 44.2% 54.4% 49.5% 55.4% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 3/3 1.0 5.3 52.8% 46.5% 36.2% 28.4% 13.9% 42.2% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 7/7 1.0 3.4 53.5% 55.2% 40.5% 37.9% 37.3% 48.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 6/8 2.0 4.5 64.2% 60.4% 45.9% 63.2% 81.9% 55.0% 44.2% 2015 3/4 6.3 2.3 63.6% 59.4% 44.6% 48.1% 53.3% 53.7% 41.5%
27 2012 22/24 1.0 3.8 62.7% 59.3% 39.5% 49.5% 47.4% 51.8% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 9/9 0.9 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 45.2% 49.0% 53.9% 52.6% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 41/44 1.7 3.0 59.5% 62.2% 49.4% 54.3% 48.9% 56.9% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 24/25 2.0 3.3 62.4% 61.9% 50.1% 52.0% 50.0% 57.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 163/186 1.8 3.6 60.1% 60.8% 45.6% 50.9% 49.4% 54.6% 42.6% — 161/240 5.6 3.6 61.0% 69.8% 47.0% 54.2% 45.3% 60.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Casey Dellacqua Nicole Vaidisova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1672 120.2 -1.78 -0.72 0.682 40.6% +8 -112 — 60.5% +0.53 7–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.63
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1948 146.7 +3.98 +0.60 1.172 53.0% 0 -245 -351 67.2% +1.49 16–2 (89%) 8–9 (47%) 110.8 -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1937 151.5 +4.00 +0.94 1.131 52.3% -11 -77 -249 63.2% +0.93 11–8 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 98.8 +0.48
18 2003 1489 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.02 2007 1955 155.4 +7.77 +1.32 1.244 54.1% -8 -61 -138 70.1% +1.39 6–7 (46%) 6–4 (60%) 100.0 +0.64
19 2004 1473 96.4 -3.43 -1.30 0.865 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14 2008 1703 127.8 +3.94 -2.60 1.033 50.4% +35 +79 +129 47.7% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 92.1 -0.26
20 2005 1475 101.7 -1.70 -1.14 0.860 46.6% +3 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 2009 1576 103.2 -2.86 -1.96 0.879 47.1% +83 +121 — 36.6% -1.02 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +1.38
21 2006 1501 113.4 -0.08 -1.23 0.504 37.7% -2 — — 37.5% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22 2010 1577 105.4 +1.21 +0.70 1.062 51.9% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.09
22 2007 1502 122.1 -1.56 -0.63 0.973 49.3% +17 — +91 43.2% -0.18 1–7 (13%) — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1630 126.8 -0.29 +1.02 1.014 50.2% +9 -98 -24 47.5% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 103.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1598 101.9 -2.95 -1.13 0.664 40.6% +4 — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1563 103.6 -3.53 -0.93 0.814 45.4% +23 — — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1541 104.0 -1.59 -2.06 0.982 49.7% — -17 — 42.1% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.43 2015 1565 115.0 -0.33 +1.19 0.897 48.2% +67 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.40
27 2012 1593 122.1 -1.70 -0.55 0.901 47.8% -3 — +45 42.3% -0.52 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1490 95.2 -2.07 -4.32 0.712 44.0% +4 — — 15.8% -2.16 0–1 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1742 139.6 +0.67 +0.45 1.011 50.3% -28 -176 -39 55.2% +0.23 13–6 (68%) 4–5 (44%) 108.7 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1629 117.9 -0.10 -0.71 0.929 48.4% -22 -90 +90 43.1% -0.65 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1613 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1758 127.4 -0.70 -0.33 0.939 48.7% -5 -99 +29 43.8% -0.46 31–34 (48%) 14–22 (39%) 100.0 +0.60 — 2006 146.1 +4.19 0.00 1.102 51.8% +10 -78 -113 60.3% +0.77 49–27 (64%) 23–26 (47%) 103.4 +0.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.