H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Sania Mirza H2H: 0-1
Sania Mirza holds a 1–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sania Mirza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sania Mirza won the 2007 Japan Open fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 39
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2007* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sania Mirza | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sania Mirza | #707 | #27 | 1,148 | 1,819 | 121 | 117 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Sania Mirza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #57 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #278 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |