H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 0-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2007 Seoul third round 1-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 27, 2007* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #90 1-6 6-3 6-2 Casey Dellacqua #83 Match data
May 29, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tamarine Tanasugarn #68 6-3 4-6 6-4 Casey Dellacqua #119 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,761 79 105 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,490 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,473 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,475 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,502 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,502 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2008 17–16 51.5% #53 1,618 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,587 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,555 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,535 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,584 0 0 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,484 0 0 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,745 0 0 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,629 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4