H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Casey Dellacqua vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-0

Casey Dellacqua holds a 2–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casey Dellacqua
Australia Age 41 Left-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Casey Dellacqua #61 6-2 6-2 Tamira Paszek Match data Jul 1, 2015* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Casey Dellacqua #56 6-1 4-0 (ret.) Tamira Paszek Match data Mar 16, 2008* R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Casey Dellacqua #932 #26 1,725 1,757 80 106 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casey Dellacqua Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #287 1,489 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2004 0–2 0.0% #291 1,472 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2005 1–2 33.3% #195 1,474 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2006 3–4 42.9% #157 1,501 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2007 6–12 33.3% #86 1,501 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2008 18–17 51.4% #53 1,629 0 0 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #1002 1,597 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2010 2–5 28.6% #227 1,563 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2011 3–5 37.5% #134 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 10–14 41.7% #101 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 1–8 11.1% #142 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–17 61.4% #29 1,741 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 9–16 36.0% #116 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Casey Dellacqua Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2006 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 11 9 20 55.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 3 9 12 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 53 74 127 41.7% 10 16 26 38.5% 17 16 33 51.5% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 163/185 of Casey Dellacqua's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Casey Dellacqua Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2004 1/2 2.0 6.0 53.4% 56.4% 41.2% 66.7% 37.5% 49.3% 43.8% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2005 1/3 1.0 7.0 54.3% 63.2% 50.0% 33.3% 42.9% 57.1% 36.8% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2006 1/7 1.0 7.0 47.4% 55.6% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 47.4% 26.5% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2007 17/18 1.8 3.6 60.5% 60.6% 44.5% 42.3% 53.2% 54.1% 44.7% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2008 31/35 2.9 4.3 58.6% 63.1% 44.2% 54.4% 49.5% 55.4% 45.2% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2009 3/3 1.0 5.3 52.8% 46.5% 36.2% 28.4% 13.9% 42.2% 38.4% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2010 7/7 1.0 3.4 53.5% 55.2% 40.5% 37.9% 37.3% 48.1% 42.3% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2011 6/8 2.0 4.5 64.2% 60.4% 45.9% 63.2% 81.9% 55.0% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 22/24 1.0 3.8 62.7% 59.3% 39.5% 49.5% 47.4% 51.8% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 9/9 0.9 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 45.2% 49.0% 53.9% 52.6% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 41/44 1.7 3.0 59.5% 62.2% 49.4% 54.3% 48.9% 56.9% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 24/25 2.0 3.3 62.4% 61.9% 50.1% 52.0% 50.0% 57.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 163/186 1.8 3.6 60.1% 60.8% 45.6% 50.9% 49.4% 54.6% 42.6% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Casey Dellacqua Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2003 1489 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.02 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2004 1473 96.4 -3.43 -1.30 0.865 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2005 1475 101.7 -1.70 -1.14 0.860 46.6% +3 — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2006 1501 113.4 -0.08 -1.23 0.504 37.7% -2 — — 37.5% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.22 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2007 1502 122.1 -1.56 -0.63 0.973 49.3% +17 — +91 43.2% -0.18 1–7 (13%) — — -0.01 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2008 1630 126.8 -0.29 +1.02 1.014 50.2% +9 -98 -24 47.5% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 103.0 +0.09 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2009 1598 101.9 -2.95 -1.13 0.664 40.6% +4 — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.17 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2010 1563 103.6 -3.53 -0.93 0.814 45.4% +23 — — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.55 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2011 1541 104.0 -1.59 -2.06 0.982 49.7% — -17 — 42.1% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1593 122.1 -1.70 -0.55 0.901 47.8% -3 — +45 42.3% -0.52 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1490 95.2 -2.07 -4.32 0.712 44.0% +4 — — 15.8% -2.16 0–1 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1742 139.6 +0.67 +0.45 1.011 50.3% -28 -176 -39 55.2% +0.23 13–6 (68%) 4–5 (44%) 108.7 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1629 117.9 -0.10 -0.71 0.929 48.4% -22 -90 +90 43.1% -0.65 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1613 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1758 127.4 -0.70 -0.33 0.939 48.7% -5 -99 +29 43.8% -0.46 31–34 (48%) 14–22 (39%) 100.0 +0.60 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.