H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-0
Casey Dellacqua holds a 2–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | 6-2 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass |
| Casey Dellacqua | 6-1 4-0 (ret.) | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Mar 13, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,762 | 80 | 106 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |