H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Casey Dellacqua vs Tzipora Obziler H2H: 0-1
Tzipora Obziler holds a 1–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tzipora Obziler leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tzipora Obziler won the 2007 Kolkata fourth round 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007* | Kolkata | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Tzipora Obziler | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tzipora Obziler | #316 | #75 | 393 | 1,629 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casey Dellacqua | Tzipora Obziler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #146 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |