H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catalina Cristea vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-1
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Catalina Cristea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1994 Australian Open second round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROM
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Catalina Cristea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalina Cristea | #687 | #59 | 440 | 1,633 | 49 | 98 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catalina Cristea | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #127 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1994 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #189 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1997 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1999 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #119 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |