H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catalina Cristea vs Miho Saeki H2H: 0-1
Miho Saeki holds a 1–0 lead over Catalina Cristea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miho Saeki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miho Saeki won the 1999 Auckland third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROM
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1999* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Miho Saeki | 6-2 6-1 | Catalina Cristea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalina Cristea | #687 | #59 | 440 | 1,633 | 49 | 98 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catalina Cristea | Miho Saeki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #127 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #189 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #119 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |