H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catalina Cristea vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-1
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Catalina Cristea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1998 Indian Wells second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROM
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-1 6-1 | Catalina Cristea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalina Cristea | #687 | #59 | 440 | 1,633 | 49 | 98 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catalina Cristea | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #127 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #189 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #67 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #119 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |