H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-2
Ann Grossman holds a 2–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1992 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-2 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |