H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Claudia Porwik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on carpet, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1990 Filderstadt third round 3-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1990* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Claudia Porwik | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1988* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 7-5 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |