H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 3-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 3–1 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Debbie Spence Nasim leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1986 US Open first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-1 6-2 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| May 30, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Debbie Spence Nasim | 7-5 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1985* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-2 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1985* | Ginny Championships | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Debbie Spence Nasim | — | — | — | 1,837 | 56 | 62 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Debbie Spence Nasim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |