H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Elna Reinach H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Elna Reinach are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on grass, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1989 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1989* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-2 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elna Reinach | 7-6 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |