H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 0-2
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 2–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1989 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jul 4, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |