H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-4
Jana Novotna holds a 4–1 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1992 San Diego third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1991* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-1 2-6 7-6 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1988* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-4 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |