H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Kate Gompert H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Kate Gompert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1986 Hilton Head second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kate Gompert | 6-2 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1986* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-3 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |