H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 2-2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Katerina Maleeva are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–1 on carpet, while Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1991 Brighton quarterfinal 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1991* | Brighton | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 7-6 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1988* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-1 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1986* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Katerina Maleeva | 7-6 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1986* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-0 7-5 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |