H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Laura Arraya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1986 Amelia Island fourth round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1986* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-3 7-5 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1984* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 7-5 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |