H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 2-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–1 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1985 US Open third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-5 6-0 | Leigh Anne Thompson | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-2 | Leigh Anne Thompson | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Leigh Anne Thompson | 6-2 6-0 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Leigh Anne Thompson | — | — | — | 1,793 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Leigh Anne Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–8 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |