H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Maria Strandlund Tomsvik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1989 Geneva third round 6-0 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1989* | Geneva | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| Dec 3, 1988* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |