H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1988 Taipei fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1988* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-0 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |