H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Mercedes Paz are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 2–1 on clay, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1988 New Orleans third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1988* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| May 25, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| May 27, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-0 7-6(5) | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| May 22, 1986* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |