H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Monique Javer H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Monique Javer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Monique Javer won the 1992 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 58
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1992* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monique Javer | 6-4 7-5 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Monique Javer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Monique Javer | #746 | #56 | 20 | 1,685 | 63 | 105 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Monique Javer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #73 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #72 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #185 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #779 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |