H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-1
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan and Nathalie Herreman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1990 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1990* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Herreman | 6-2 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| May 16, 1985* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |