H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 2-0
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1991 Hamburg second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-4 6-4 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| May 4, 1989* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-1 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |