H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Silke Meier H2H: 2-0
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1990 Berlin second round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1990* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-6 6-0 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| May 29, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Silke Meier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |