H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 2-0
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1988 Filderstadt third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1988* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1987* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-5 6-1 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |