H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-1
Catherine Suire and Andrea Temesvari are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Suire won the 1991 Bayonne third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1991* | Bayonne | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catherine Suire | 6-2 6-1 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| May 24, 1984* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-0 6-1 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Suire | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |