H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Eva Krapl H2H: 2-0
Catherine Suire holds a 2–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Suire won the 1988 Key Biscayne second round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Catherine Suire | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1986* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catherine Suire | 6-7 7-5 6-1 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Suire | Eva Krapl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |