H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1986 Montreal second round 6-1 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catherine Suire | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |