H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 0-1
Natalia Medvedeva holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Medvedeva won the 1992 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1992* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-3 6-3 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Suire | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |