H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Neige Dias H2H: 1-0
Catherine Suire holds a 1–0 lead over Neige Dias in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catherine Suire won the 1987 Phoenix fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Catherine Suire | 7-5 6-2 | Neige Dias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neige Dias | — | — | — | 1,748 | 75 | 75 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Catherine Suire | Neige Dias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |