H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Catherine Suire vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 1-2
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 2–1 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Susan Sloane Lundy leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Catherine Suire leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Catherine Suire won the 1991 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Catherine Suire | 6-2 6-2 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1991* | Aurora | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-2 6-3 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Catherine Suire | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |